Causes And Effects Of Communication Gap In Office Administrative Efficiency (a Case Study Of Udi Local Government Area)

The causes and effects of communication gap in office administrative.  Efficiency especially in Udi Local Government Area. Since its inception cannot be over emphasized. This project is an insight of the communication is as old as the existence of human society since no one can hardly exist without the interaction with other person.  The important of communication to the society cannot be over emphasized.

It is no exaggeration to say that the communication function is the means by which organized activity is unified.  It is observed to say that communication gap or down in communication process are said to cause radical problems, business failure, divorces, wars and many other business problem.

To establish what communication gap is communication gap can be defined as a dynamic process in which man consciously or unconsciously affects the cognation of another through material or agencies used in a symbolic way”.

The cause of communication gap in Udi Local Government, according to the researcher are such as lack of telephone link with various office and inefficiency of secretaries.

These causes hinder effective good communication with the advice effects which communication breakdown solution is not provided for in time.  It is the inner most desire of the researcher to introduce the practice of good communication services and its importance to Udi Local Government AREA

Title page

Approval page

Dedication

Acknowledgment

Abstract 

Table of contends

List of tables

CHAPTER ONE 

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of study

1.2 Statement of problem

1.3 Objectives of the study

1.4 Scope and limitation

1.5 Research question

1.6 Significance of the study

1.7 Definition of terms

    References

CHAPTER TWO 

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 Historical perspective of cause and effects of communication gap in office administrative efficiency

2.2 Non-Verbal communication

2.3 hearing what we expect to hear

2.4 Influence of reference groups

2.5 Perceptions about the communicator

2.6 Ignoring information that conflicts with what we already know

2.7 Size of the organization

2.8 Summary of related reviewed literature

    Reference

CHAPTER THREE

1.0 Summary

3.1 Recommendation

3.2 Conclusion