ABSTRACT
Man is by nature a social animal. An individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human.
Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of the society, is either a beast or a god.1
This quote by Aristotle poignantly points out the fact that interactions with ourselves as human beings is a must, and the need for this interactions often lead to the necessity of an agreement based on a contract. However, owing to human foibles, there are times when this
„agreement‟ is different from the intention either party had as regards the contract.
This study therefore examines the effect that law, especially the doctrine of NON EST FACTUM has on a contract.
It further examines the principle of MISTAKE which is a precursor to NON EST FACTUM, the effect of consent, which is central to the world of contracts and most especially the plea of NON EST FACTUM.
It also takes a look at its applicability in criminal cases and whether or not the plea itself can be used as a sword or a shield by either party.
Finally, this essay gives recommendations as to how the plea of NON EST FACTUM can be improved upon.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
COVER PAGE
CERTIFICATION PAGE
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
TABLE OF CASES
TABLE OF STATUTES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER 1
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0.0: INTRODUCTION
1.1.0: BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
1.2.0: OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1.3.0: FOCUS OF THE STUDY
1.4.0: SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1.5.0: METHODOLOGY
1.6.0: LITERATURE REVIEW
1.7.0: CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 2
DOCTRINE OF MISTAKE
2.0.0: INTRODUCTION
2.1.0: MEANING AND EFFECT OF MISTAKE IN LAW
2.2.0: COMMON MISTAKE
2.3.0: MUTUAL MISTAKE
2.4.0: UNILATERAL MISTAKE
2.5.0: MISTAKE IN EQUITY
2.6.0: CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 3
SCOPE OF NON EST FACTUM
3.0.0: INTRODUCTION
3.1.0: NON EST FACTUM AND THE ILLITERATE
3.1.1: NON EST FACTUM AND THE OLD
3.1.2: NON EST FACTUM QAND THE INSANE PEOPLE
3.1.3: NON EST FACTUM AND INFANTS
3.2.0: APPLICABILITY OF THE PRINCIPLE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS IN NIGERIA
3.3.0: CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 4
DOCUMENTS MISTAKENLY SIGNED
4.0.0: INTRODUCTION
4.1.0: CHARACTER AND CONTENT
4.2.0: NEGLIGENCE
4.3.0: PLEA OF NON EST FACTUM
4.4.0: THE NIGERIAN SITUATION (EGBASE V ORIAREGAN)
4.5.0: CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 5
GENERAL CONCLUSION
5.0.0: CONCLUSION
5.2.0: RECOMMENDATION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES ON THE INTERNET
BOOKS
Disclaimer: Note this academic material is intended as a guide for your academic research work. Do not copy word for word. Note: For Computer or Programming related works, some works might not contain source codes
CITE THIS WORK
(2014, 01). Egbase V Oriareghan (1985) Effect Of Non Est Factum On Contract.. ProjectStoc.com. Retrieved 01, 2014, from https://projectstoc.com/read/1945/egbase-v-oriareghan-1985-effect-of-non-est-factum-on-contract
"Egbase V Oriareghan (1985) Effect Of Non Est Factum On Contract." ProjectStoc.com. 01 2014. 2014. 01 2014 <https://projectstoc.com/read/1945/egbase-v-oriareghan-1985-effect-of-non-est-factum-on-contract>.
"Egbase V Oriareghan (1985) Effect Of Non Est Factum On Contract.." ProjectStoc.com. ProjectStoc.com, 01 2014. Web. 01 2014. <https://projectstoc.com/read/1945/egbase-v-oriareghan-1985-effect-of-non-est-factum-on-contract>.
"Egbase V Oriareghan (1985) Effect Of Non Est Factum On Contract.." ProjectStoc.com. 01, 2014. Accessed 01, 2014. https://projectstoc.com/read/1945/egbase-v-oriareghan-1985-effect-of-non-est-factum-on-contract.